FTO & Infringement Risk
For product launch and market entry, from search and comparison to risk levels and design-around options.
- Claim feature mapping
- Product comparison
- Risk levels and alternatives
Patent Judgment / Litigation Strategy / Cross-Border Risk
Complex technical facts must become actionable patent judgment.
Positioning
Profile
Li Qi is an Attorney at Law, CN, Patent Attorney, China, and Attorney at Law, California. Trained at Tsinghua, he advises on machinery, medical-device, robotics, automotive, and cross-border patent matters.
Practice
Every matter starts with the same question: what should the company, investor, or litigation team do next?
For product launch and market entry, from search and comparison to risk levels and design-around options.
Evidence strategy, hearing preparation, infringement analysis, and procedure coordination in one track.
For investors and technology companies, covering ownership, core assets, FTO, and remediation paths.
Work with overseas counsel on filings, third-party opinions, and disputes in the U.S., Europe, and Germany.
Selected Work
Reviewed ownership, core technologies, patent coverage, infringement exposure, and remediation items for investment teams.
Built an enforcement path across infringement comparison, evidence, sales data, invalidity response, and enforcement.
Handled prior art, specification support, inventiveness, and hearing presentation for complex machinery.
Coordinated clients, engineers, and German counsel for non-infringement and validity negotiation.
Supported patent filing and examination for medical devices, automotive engineering, robotics, MEMS, and related technologies.
Built practical portfolio plans from patent navigation, technology transfer, and technical-roadmap analysis.
Method
Market-entry clearance, financing diligence, infringement action, invalidity response, or overseas expansion.
Map product structure, claim language, technical effects, and evidence sources feature by feature.
Clarify risk level, legal basis, timing, alternatives, and the next materials needed for action.
Public Voice
What matters is not the number of patents. It is whether they cover the key technology, withstand challenge, and support real business moves.
Thinking
Ongoing attention to Supreme People's Court decisions, patent evaluation reports, doctrine of equivalents, and IP due diligence for technology companies.
Discussion of the boundary between patent evaluation reports and patent validity in recent retrial decisions.
Extracting practical standards from Supreme People's Court cases involving limitations on equivalents.
Building defense arguments from claim notice, specification disclosure, and the patentee's drafting choices.
Judgment
From claims, product structures, evidence, and commercial timing, complex questions become the next move.